Carnes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carnes v. State

363 S.W.3d 45, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1471, 2011 WL 5335472

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 8, 2011·No. WD 72916·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Keith Carnes appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Carnes sought to vacate his convictions for first-degree murder, section 565.020, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000, and concurrent sentences of life imprisonment without probation or parole and life imprisonment, respectively. He claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when counsel failed to call a forensic or crime scene reconstruc-tionist to testify at trial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Keith Carnes appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Carnes sought to vacate his convictions for first-degree murder, section 565.020, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000, and concurrent sentences of life imprisonment without probation or parole and life imprisonment, respectively. He claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when counsel failed to call a forensic or crime scene reconstruc-tionist to testify at trial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Carnes v. State, 363 S.W.3d 45, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1471, 2011 WL 5335472 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

363 S.W.3d 45 (Carnes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.