Carnell v. Dr. Geo. Leininger Chemical Co.

80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 706
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 16, 1909
DocketNo. 10930
StatusPublished

This text of 80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 706 (Carnell v. Dr. Geo. Leininger Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carnell v. Dr. Geo. Leininger Chemical Co., 80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 706 (Ohio 1909).

Opinion

Judgment reversed. . Grounds stated in journal entry.

[707]*707It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of said circuit court be and.the same is hereby reversed for error in affirming the judgment of the court of common pleas, and this court proceeding to render the judgment which said circuit court should have rendered, it' is ordered and adjudged, that the judgment of the court of common pleas be, and the same is hereby reversed, for error in overruling the motion for a new trial, on the ground that said court erred in holding that said goods had been accepted by the defendant, and for error in holding that the defendant had no right to reject and return the goods. The receipt of the goods and the sale of a few articles was not an acceptance. If the five hundred books specified in the memorandum were to be special books, such as defendant described, then the defendant could, after the plaintiff’s refusal or failure to supply them, return the goods and the defendant in such case is not liable.

Summers, Spear, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carnell-v-dr-geo-leininger-chemical-co-ohio-1909.