Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd.

805 F.3d 1382, 117 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1099, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20233, 2015 WL 7273271

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carnegie Mellon’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied in part and held in abeyance in part. The court will hold in abeyance any decision on the request for rehearing en banc with respect to the first issue raised in Carnegie Mellon’s petition, which seeks review of the panel’s ruling on the enhancement of damages issue. The court will hold Carnegie Mellon’s petition as to that issue pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 769 F.3d 1371 (Fed.Cir.2014) cert. granted, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 356, 193 L.Ed.3d 289 (2015) and Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc., 782 F.3d 649 (Fed.Cir.2015) cert. granted, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 356, 193 L.Ed.3d 289 (2015). Carnegie Mellon’s petition for rehearing en banc is otherwise denied. Marvell’s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is denied. A partial mandate will issue returning the case to the district court, which shall have discretion to determine how and when best to handle the proceedings on remand.

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Carnegie Mellon’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied in part and held in abeyance in part.

(2) Marvell’s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is denied

(3)A partial mandate will issue on November 24, 2015.