Carnegie Institute of Medical Laboratory Technique, Inc. v. Approving Authority for Schools for Training Medical Laboratory Technologists

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Carnegie Institute of Medical Laboratory Technique, Inc. v. Approving Authority for Schools for Training Medical Laboratory Technologists

213 N.E.2d 229, 350 Mass. 761

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedDecember 30, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 213 N.E.2d 229 (Carnegie Institute of Medical Laboratory Technique, Inc. v. Approving Authority for Schools for Training Medical Laboratory Technologists) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carnegie Institute of Medical Laboratory Technique, Inc. v. Approving Authority for Schools for Training Medical Laboratory Technologists, 213 N.E.2d 229, 350 Mass. 761 (Mass. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

This petition by Carnegie Institute against the approving authority attacks the conduct of a hearing by the authority upon the petitioner’s application for approval as a school. This petition is apparently brought pursuant to G. L. c. 112, § 2 (which is conceded in the Attorney General’s brief), and a principal objection is the sufficiency of the evidence. The trial judge denied the petitioner’s motions to remand and to amend which contained allegations as to the invalidity of St. 1955, e. 759. The issue of invalidity, therefore, was not passed upon by the trial judge, who made no reference thereto in his findings and rulings. The authority urges that -the petitioner’s appeal was not timely. We do not prolong this opinion by a discussion of this issue, because it is clear from our decision of today in the case of the same name, ante, 26, that the approving authority has no valid existence. It would be incongruous to hold simultaneously that its existence is both valid and invalid. Accordingly, we reverse the decree affirming the decision of the authority.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This petition by Carnegie Institute against the approving authority attacks the conduct of a hearing by the authority upon the petitioner’s application for approval as a school. This petition is apparently brought pursuant to G. L. c. 112, § 2 (which is conceded in the Attorney General’s brief), and a principal objection is the sufficiency of the evidence. The trial judge denied the petitioner’s motions to remand and to amend which contained allegations as to the invalidity of St. 1955, e. 759. The issue of invalidity, therefore, was not passed upon by the trial judge, who made no reference thereto in his findings and rulings. The authority urges that -the petitioner’s appeal was not timely. We do not prolong this opinion by a discussion of this issue, because it is clear from our decision of today in the case of the same name, ante, 26, that the approving authority has no valid existence. It would be incongruous to hold simultaneously that its existence is both valid and invalid. Accordingly, we reverse the decree affirming the decision of the authority.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 N.E.2d 229, 350 Mass. 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carnegie-institute-of-medical-laboratory-technique-inc-v-approving-mass-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack