Carneal v. Jacobson

561 So. 2d 309, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1244, 1990 WL 18477
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 1990
DocketNo. 89-03451
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 561 So. 2d 309 (Carneal v. Jacobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carneal v. Jacobson, 561 So. 2d 309, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1244, 1990 WL 18477 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus which we treat as a petition for writ of certiorari. After reviewing the petition, the response, the reply, and the appendices, we have determined that no departure from the essential requirements of law has been demonstrated, and accordingly, the petition is denied.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sayih v. Perlmutter
561 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 So. 2d 309, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1244, 1990 WL 18477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carneal-v-jacobson-fladistctapp-1990.