Carnation Photoplay Co. v. Basson
This text of 216 A.D. 769 (Carnation Photoplay Co. v. Basson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying temporary injunction reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. On the facts disclosed by the record, picketing the plaintiff’s premises was an unlawful act. (Stuyvesant L. & B. Corp. v. Reiner, 110 Misc. 357; affd., 192 App. Div. 951; Yates Hotel Co. v. Meyers, 195 N. Y. Supp. 558: Rosen Bros. & Co. v. Mackler, 209 App. Div. 886; Yablonowitz v. Korn, 205 id. 440.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox and Kapper, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., dissents. (See N. & R. Theatres, Inc., v. Basson, N. Y. L. J. March 11, 1925; Id. May 1, 1925.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 A.D. 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carnation-photoplay-co-v-basson-nyappdiv-1926.