Carnation Photoplay Co. v. Basson

216 A.D. 769

This text of 216 A.D. 769 (Carnation Photoplay Co. v. Basson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carnation Photoplay Co. v. Basson, 216 A.D. 769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Order denying temporary injunction reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. On the facts disclosed by the record, picketing the plaintiff’s premises was an unlawful act. (Stuyvesant L. & B. Corp. v. Reiner, 110 Misc. 357; affd., 192 App. Div. 951; Yates Hotel Co. v. Meyers, 195 N. Y. Supp. 558: Rosen Bros. & Co. v. Mackler, 209 App. Div. 886; Yablonowitz v. Korn, 205 id. 440.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox and Kapper, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., dissents. (See N. & R. Theatres, Inc., v. Basson, N. Y. L. J. March 11, 1925; Id. May 1, 1925.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. Republic Distributing Corp.
192 A.D. 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
Rosen Bros. v. Mackler
209 A.D. 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Stuyvesant L. & B. Corp. v. Reiner
110 Misc. 357 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 A.D. 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carnation-photoplay-co-v-basson-nyappdiv-1926.