Carnation Enterprises P. Ltd. v. United States

Court of International Trade

Carnation Enterprises P. Ltd. v. United States

46 F. Supp. 2d 1051, 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 213, 23 C.I.T. 214, 21 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1447, 1999 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 26

United States Court of International Trade·Decided April 1, 1999·No. Consol. 91-11-00826·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

DiCARLO, Senior Judge.

The United States Department of Commerce submitted its Results of Redetermi-nation in accordance with this Court’s Remand order of May 13, 1994, in the case of Carnation Enterprises Ltd., et al. v. Unit *1052 ed States, Consolidated Court No. 91—11—00826. The Department of Commerce requested this remand pursuant to the remand from the Court in Creswell Trading Company, Inc., et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 91-01-00012, Slip Op. 98-87. In its Redetermination of the 1989 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-specific subsidy rates by revising the rates relating to India’s International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS). The new company-specific and all others rates applicable to the 1989 period of review are as follows:

Carnation Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. 16.10%

UMA Iron & Steel Co. 16.22%

Govind Steel 20.36%

Tirupati 20.36%

Ragunath Prasad Phoolchand 20.36%

All Others 2.50%

These rates have been stipulated to and accepted by all parties to this action.

The Court having reviewed the Redeter-mination Results, Commerce having complied with the Court’s Remand, and the parties having stipulated to the new rates, it is hereby.

ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are affirmed; and it is further.

ORDERED that the rates listed above shall become the new rates for the 1989 period, and it is further.

ORDERED that, as the parties have stipulated that they will not litigate any other issues, this action is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT ORDER

DiCARLO, Senior Judge.

The United States Department of Commerce submitted its Results of Redetermi-nation in accordance with this Court’s Remand order of May 13, 1994, in the case of Carnation Enterprises Ltd., et al. v. Unit *1052 ed States, Consolidated Court No. 91—11—00826. The Department of Commerce requested this remand pursuant to the remand from the Court in Creswell Trading Company, Inc., et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 91-01-00012, Slip Op. 98-87. In its Redetermination of the 1989 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-specific subsidy rates by revising the rates relating to India’s International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS). The new company-specific and all others rates applicable to the 1989 period of review are as follows:

Carnation Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. 16.10%

UMA Iron & Steel Co. 16.22%

Govind Steel 20.36%

Tirupati 20.36%

Ragunath Prasad Phoolchand 20.36%

All Others 2.50%

These rates have been stipulated to and accepted by all parties to this action.

The Court having reviewed the Redeter-mination Results, Commerce having complied with the Court’s Remand, and the parties having stipulated to the new rates, it is hereby.

ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are affirmed; and it is further.

ORDERED that the rates listed above shall become the new rates for the 1989 period, and it is further.

ORDERED that, as the parties have stipulated that they will not litigate any other issues, this action is dismissed.

Carnation Enterprises P. Ltd. v. United States, 46 F. Supp. 2d 1051, 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 213, 23 C.I.T. 214, 21 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1447, 1999 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 26 (cit 1999).

Pincite

46 F. Supp. 2d 1051 (Carnation Enterprises P. Ltd. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.