Carnathan v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Carnathan v. State

93 So. 50, 18 Ala. App. 452, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 141

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 18, 1922

Docket2 Div. 230.

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 93 So. 50 (Carnathan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carnathan v. State, 93 So. 50, 18 Ala. App. 452, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 141 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

S'4-MFORD, J.

The question of importance presented by this record is whether the xirosecution is barred by the statutes of limitation. More than 12 months before the return of the indictment a prosecution was begun against this defendant, charging him with robbery. The defendant waived examination, and was bound over to ■ the grand jury on that charge. Upon investigating the charge, the grand jury refused to make presentment on the charge of robbery, but did return a bill charging the defendant with presenting a gun, under section 6893 of the Code of 1907, and it is here admitted that the act charged, if committed, was committed more than 12 months before the return of the indictment. The warrant charging robbery, being relied on to save the running of the statute of limitation, must of necessity embrace the charge included in the indictment for presenting a gun. If the indictment .charges another distinct offense, although it may belong to the same family of offenses as that charged in the warrant, it cannot be a continuation of the prosecution begun by the issuance of the warrant. Jackson v. State, 106 Ala. 136, 17 South. 349.

The charge of robbery \fras a crime under the common law against the person and property of another, and of necessity embraces all the lesser crimes growing out of the transaction, such as assault with intent to rob, attempt to rob, and larceny, grand and petit. 8 Michie’s Dig. 665, § 115. But section 6893 of the Code of 1907, creating the offense against presenting a gun, is a mere police regulation, against the reckless *453 or careless use of firearms, and contains none of the elements of that class of crimes relating to robberies.

The court was in error in permitting the defendant to be convicted on proof .being made that the offense was committed more than 12 months before the finding of the indictment. For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and, as it is agreed that the offense, if committed, was more than 12 months before the return of the indictment, a judgment will here be rendered, discharging the defendant.

Reversed and rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S'4-MFORD, J.

The question of importance presented by this record is whether the xirosecution is barred by the statutes of limitation. More than 12 months before the return of the indictment a prosecution was begun against this defendant, charging him with robbery. The defendant waived examination, and was bound over to ■ the grand jury on that charge. Upon investigating the charge, the grand jury refused to make presentment on the charge of robbery, but did return a bill charging the defendant with presenting a gun, under section 6893 of the Code of 1907, and it is here admitted that the act charged, if committed, was committed more than 12 months before the return of the indictment. The warrant charging robbery, being relied on to save the running of the statute of limitation, must of necessity embrace the charge included in the indictment for presenting a gun. If the indictment .charges another distinct offense, although it may belong to the same family of offenses as that charged in the warrant, it cannot be a continuation of the prosecution begun by the issuance of the warrant. Jackson v. State, 106 Ala. 136, 17 South. 349.

The charge of robbery \fras a crime under the common law against the person and property of another, and of necessity embraces all the lesser crimes growing out of the transaction, such as assault with intent to rob, attempt to rob, and larceny, grand and petit. 8 Michie’s Dig. 665, § 115. But section 6893 of the Code of 1907, creating the offense against presenting a gun, is a mere police regulation, against the reckless *453 or careless use of firearms, and contains none of the elements of that class of crimes relating to robberies.

The court was in error in permitting the defendant to be convicted on proof .being made that the offense was committed more than 12 months before the finding of the indictment. For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and, as it is agreed that the offense, if committed, was more than 12 months before the return of the indictment, a judgment will here be rendered, discharging the defendant.

Reversed and rendered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 So. 50, 18 Ala. App. 452, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carnathan-v-state-alactapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack