Carnahan v. Connolly
17 Colo. App. 105
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carnahan v. Connolly. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 Colo. App. 98 →
Opinion
The questions involved in this case are the same as those determined in No. 1933, Charles T. Carnahan, plaintiff in error, v. P. K. Connolly, defendant in error, and for reasons given in that case the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carnahan v. Connolly, 17 Colo. App. 105 (Colo. Ct. App. 1902).
17 Colo. App. 105 (Carnahan v. Connolly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.