Carnagie v. Penn Bridge Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Carnagie v. Penn Bridge Co.

47 A. 355, 197 Pa. 441, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 760

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 31, 1900

DocketAppeal, No. 69

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A. 355 (Carnagie v. Penn Bridge Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carnagie v. Penn Bridge Co., 47 A. 355, 197 Pa. 441, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 760 (Pa. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee, Cubiam:,

In this case the court below on the defendant’s motion entered a compulsory nonsuit. It was followed by the plaintiff’s motion to take it off, which motion upon due consideration was discharged. In this action of the court we find no error. There was no evidence to support a charge of negligence against the defendant, and if there was any negligence in the case, it was that of the plaintiff or his coemployee.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee, Cubiam:,

In this case the court below on the defendant’s motion entered a compulsory nonsuit. It was followed by the plaintiff’s motion to take it off, which motion upon due consideration was discharged. In this action of the court we find no error. There was no evidence to support a charge of negligence against the defendant, and if there was any negligence in the case, it was that of the plaintiff or his coemployee.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A. 355, 197 Pa. 441, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carnagie-v-penn-bridge-co-pa-1900.