Carmona v. Padilla
149 N.E.2d 337, 4 N.Y.2d 767
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dyb, Fuld, Froessel and Burke. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the amended complaint upon the ground that there is no evidence in the record of actionable negligence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carmona v. Padilla, 149 N.E.2d 337, 4 N.Y.2d 767 (N.Y. 1958).
149 N.E.2d 337 (Carmona v. Padilla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Klimek v. Town of Ghent
134 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Acquaviva v. Piazzolla
100 A.D.2d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Costa v. Hicks
98 A.D.2d 137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Young v. Dalidowicz
92 A.D.2d 242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Nolechek v. Gesuale
385 N.E.2d 1268 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Poncher v. Brackett
246 Cal. App. 2d 769 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)