Carmine v. Wall
This text of 309 So. 2d 23 (Carmine v. Wall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants challenge entry of an order by the trial court reinstating this cause pursuant to RCP 1.540(b), after said cause had been previously dismissed for lack of prosecution under RCP 1.420(e).
After carefully reviewing the briefs of counsel and examining the appellee’s motion and evidence presented in support thereof before the trial court, we find the same fall short of establishing any of the grounds which could afford the appellee [24]*24(plaintiff below) relief under RCP 1.-540(b).
Accordingly, the trial court’s order of October 11, 1974, reinstating this cause, is
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
309 So. 2d 23, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carmine-v-wall-fladistctapp-1975.