Carminati v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carminati v. State

258 A.D. 931

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1939

DocketClaim No. 24227

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 931 (Carminati v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carminati v. State, 258 A.D. 931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The question whether the traffic signal standard erected at the center of the intersection was or was not dangerous presented a question of fact (Koehler v. City of New York, 262 N. Y. 74), and under all the circumstances we cannot say that the decision is against the weight of the evidence. All concur. (The judgment dismisses a claim against the State for damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile collision.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The question whether the traffic signal standard erected at the center of the intersection was or was not dangerous presented a question of fact (Koehler v. City of New York, 262 N. Y. 74), and under all the circumstances we cannot say that the decision is against the weight of the evidence. All concur. (The judgment dismisses a claim against the State for damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile collision.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carminati-v-state-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack