Carmichael v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Carmichael v. Thompson

6 A. 717, 8 Sadler 120, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 938

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 1, 1886

DocketNo. 60, W. D.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 A. 717 (Carmichael v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carmichael v. Thompson, 6 A. 717, 8 Sadler 120, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 938 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only question in this case is that which arises on the point of law reserved by the court below, and upon which judgment non obstante veredicto was entered for the defendant.

That the trust, created by the deed of John Carmichael to Aaron Carmichael, in favor of Phoebe and Elijah Thompson was an active one, we have no doubt, and this matter has been so ably discussed in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas that we deem a further elucidation of it unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The only question in this case is that which arises on the point of law reserved by the court below, and upon which judgment non obstante veredicto was entered for the defendant.

That the trust, created by the deed of John Carmichael to Aaron Carmichael, in favor of Phoebe and Elijah Thompson was an active one, we have no doubt, and this matter has been so ably discussed in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas that we deem a further elucidation of it unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A. 717, 8 Sadler 120, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carmichael-v-thompson-pa-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack