Carmichael v. State
This text of 834 So. 2d 421 (Carmichael v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dwight Dale CARMICHAEL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Andrea Norgard, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
DAVIS, Judge.
Dwight Dale Carmichael challenges the revocation of his probation, arguing that no affidavit of violation appears in the record. We reverse.
An order revoking probation should be vacated if no formal charge of violation of probation has been filed, and this issue may be raised for the first time on appeal. Johnston v. State, 684 So.2d 262 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Here, no affidavit of probation appears in the record, and the Highlands County clerk of circuit court has filed a "certificate of non-existence," stating that "a diligent search has been made for the Affidavit of Violation of Probation, and said document does not exist or cannot be located."
Although Carmichael's probation officer testified that she had "submitted" an affidavit of violation, this does not prove that the affidavit was formally filed. Accordingly, we reverse the revocation order.
Reversed.
SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
834 So. 2d 421, 2003 WL 131730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carmichael-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.