Carmichael v. Hoover Institution on War, Revolution & Peace

169 A.D.2d 539

This text of 169 A.D.2d 539 (Carmichael v. Hoover Institution on War, Revolution & Peace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carmichael v. Hoover Institution on War, Revolution & Peace, 169 A.D.2d 539 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered on January 5, 1990, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

We affirm for the reasons stated by Altman, J., at IAS Part 14. We would only add that since it is undisputed that defendants owed plaintiff the sum of $7,000, the payment by check of said sum, even with the condition attached, was not unequivocally indicative of a settlement of the disputed amount for additional work. Thus, a triable issue is presented [540]*540as to the defense of accord and satisfaction. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 A.D.2d 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carmichael-v-hoover-institution-on-war-revolution-peace-nyappdiv-1991.