Carmichael v. Carmichael

California Court of Appeal

Carmichael v. Carmichael

198 Cal. App. 2d 304, 17 Cal. Rptr. 558, 1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 2540

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 20, 1961

DocketCiv. No. 10440

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 Cal. App. 2d 304 (Carmichael v. Carmichael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carmichael v. Carmichael, 198 Cal. App. 2d 304, 17 Cal. Rptr. 558, 1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 2540 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.—

It is the conclusion of the court that the clear implication of the decree is that plaintiff should have immediate occupancy of the property in question. While her title to the property would not be complete until the decree became final and would be defeated by death or reconciliation during the interlocutory period, we hold that reason, common sense and authority entitle her in the meantime to the right to possession of the property awarded to her. (Wilson v. Wilson, 76 Cal.App.2d 119, 132 [172 P.2d 568]; Code Civ. Proc., § 945.) The order heretofore made staying any further proceedings is hereby discharged and the petition for supersedeas is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.—

It is the conclusion of the court that the clear implication of the decree is that plaintiff should have immediate occupancy of the property in question. While her title to the property would not be complete until the decree became final and would be defeated by death or reconciliation during the interlocutory period, we hold that reason, common sense and authority entitle her in the meantime to the right to possession of the property awarded to her. (Wilson v. Wilson, 76 Cal.App.2d 119, 132 [172 P.2d 568]; Code Civ. Proc., § 945.) The order heretofore made staying any further proceedings is hereby discharged and the petition for supersedeas is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 Cal. App. 2d 304, 17 Cal. Rptr. 558, 1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 2540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carmichael-v-carmichael-calctapp-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack