Carmet Co. v. Department of Highways

West Virginia Court of Claims

Carmet Co. v. Department of Highways

13 Ct. Cl. 145

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedMarch 5, 1980

DocketCC-76-41

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ct. Cl. 145 (Carmet Co. v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carmet Co. v. Department of Highways, 13 Ct. Cl. 145 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

RULEY, JUDGE:

The claimant seeks an award in the sum of $1,577.61 for damage allegedly sustained by its 1974 model Plymouth automobile when it collided with the respondent’s truck. The collision happened on Friday, June 6,1975, at a point on W. Va. Route 2 near Moundsville in Marshall County. At that time and place, Route 2 was a two-lane highway and was substantially straight and level for several hundred feet. Both vehicles were northbound, and, at the time of the accident, the claimant’s vehicle, driven by its employee, Ellis R. Abel, was engaged in an overtaking and passing maneuver. The respondent’s truck, driven by its employee, Christopher P. Shutler, was turning left. Mr. Shutler had slowed from about 50 mph to about 30 mph but had given no signal of his intention to turn left, thereby violating West Virginia Code §17C-8-8. He testified that the rear directional signals of the truck were broken. He also testified that, before beginning the left turn, he looked in his side view mirror and saw no vehicles approaching, which impels the Court to conclude that he must not have looked effectively. On the other hand, Mr. Abel violated West Virginia Code §17C-7-3(a) by failing to give an audible signal of his intention to pass. Accordingly, both drivers were guilty of negligence which combined to proximately cause the collision and resulting damage.

Since this case was heard after Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co.,....W.Va....., 256 S.E.2d 879 (1979), the Court must apply the doctrine of comparative negligence. Atkinson v. Department of [146]*146Highwyas, 13 Ct.Cl. 18 (1979). Applying that doctrine, it appears to the Court that the negligence should be allocated 40% to the claimant and 60% to the respondent. Inasmuch as the parties stipulated the claimed damage of $1,577.61, the claimant should receive an award of 60% of that sum, viz., $946.57.

Award of $946.57.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RULEY, JUDGE:

The claimant seeks an award in the sum of $1,577.61 for damage allegedly sustained by its 1974 model Plymouth automobile when it collided with the respondent’s truck. The collision happened on Friday, June 6,1975, at a point on W. Va. Route 2 near Moundsville in Marshall County. At that time and place, Route 2 was a two-lane highway and was substantially straight and level for several hundred feet. Both vehicles were northbound, and, at the time of the accident, the claimant’s vehicle, driven by its employee, Ellis R. Abel, was engaged in an overtaking and passing maneuver. The respondent’s truck, driven by its employee, Christopher P. Shutler, was turning left. Mr. Shutler had slowed from about 50 mph to about 30 mph but had given no signal of his intention to turn left, thereby violating West Virginia Code §17C-8-8. He testified that the rear directional signals of the truck were broken. He also testified that, before beginning the left turn, he looked in his side view mirror and saw no vehicles approaching, which impels the Court to conclude that he must not have looked effectively. On the other hand, Mr. Abel violated West Virginia Code §17C-7-3(a) by failing to give an audible signal of his intention to pass. Accordingly, both drivers were guilty of negligence which combined to proximately cause the collision and resulting damage.

Since this case was heard after Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co.,....W.Va....., 256 S.E.2d 879 (1979), the Court must apply the doctrine of comparative negligence. Atkinson v. Department of [146]*146Highwyas, 13 Ct.Cl. 18 (1979). Applying that doctrine, it appears to the Court that the negligence should be allocated 40% to the claimant and 60% to the respondent. Inasmuch as the parties stipulated the claimed damage of $1,577.61, the claimant should receive an award of 60% of that sum, viz., $946.57.

Award of $946.57.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ct. Cl. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carmet-co-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack