Carmer v. Weeks
This text of 3 Johns. 246 (Carmer v. Weeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Though the court in that case intimated the opinion stated, yet it was reconsidered on a further argument the next day, and the point was not finally decided. The question is still open.
Ogden. The only question is whether the English rule of practice as to 15 or 8 days between the teste and return of a ca. sa. to charge bail, is to be adopted. In the present case the proceedings were by bill.
There is no rule of practice established in
this court, requiring eight days between the teste and feturn of a ca. sa. nor do' we see any reason which should render such a rule necessary.
Rule refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Johns. 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carmer-v-weeks-nysupct-1808.