Carmen Solis Williams v. Larry Dean Edmondson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Carmen Solis Williams v. Larry Dean Edmondson

DecidedMarch 4, 2009

Docket03-08-00218-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Carmen Solis Williams v. Larry Dean Edmondson (Carmen Solis Williams v. Larry Dean Edmondson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carmen Solis Williams v. Larry Dean Edmondson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00218-CV

Carmen Solis Williams, Appellant

v.

Larry Dean Edmondson, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-07-001869, HONORABLE JON N. WISSER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Carmen Solis Williams's pro se notice of appeal and docketing statement were filed in this Court on April 11, 2008. The appellate record was filed on December 10, making Williams's brief due on January 9, 2009. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). On January 21, we sent Williams notice that her brief was overdue and that her appeal would be subject to dismissal if she did not file a motion for extension of time by February 2. On January 29, our letter was returned to us as "not deliverable." Williams has not contacted this Court since filing her notice of appeal and docketing statement, nor has she provided any updated contact information or informed us that she has retained counsel for the appeal. Appellee's counsel has informed this Court that he does not have any alternative contact information for Williams. Because Williams has not provided this Court with a means to reach her, filed her brief, or contacted this Court since April 2008, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: March 4, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00218-CV

Carmen Solis Williams, Appellant

v.

Larry Dean Edmondson, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-07-001869, HONORABLE JON N. WISSER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Carmen Solis Williams's pro se notice of appeal and docketing statement were filed in this Court on April 11, 2008. The appellate record was filed on December 10, making Williams's brief due on January 9, 2009. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). On January 21, we sent Williams notice that her brief was overdue and that her appeal would be subject to dismissal if she did not file a motion for extension of time by February 2. On January 29, our letter was returned to us as "not deliverable." Williams has not contacted this Court since filing her notice of appeal and docketing statement, nor has she provided any updated contact information or informed us that she has retained counsel for the appeal. Appellee's counsel has informed this Court that he does not have any alternative contact information for Williams. Because Williams has not provided this Court with a means to reach her, filed her brief, or contacted this Court since April 2008, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: March 4, 2009

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Carmen Solis Williams v. Larry Dean Edmondson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carmen-solis-williams-v-larry-dean-edmondson-texapp-2009.