Carmel Wine Co. v. Palestine Hebrew Wine Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Carmel Wine Co. v. Palestine Hebrew Wine Co.

174 F. 1023, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5746

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1910

DocketNos. 2-158, 4-98

StatusPublished

This text of 174 F. 1023 (Carmel Wine Co. v. Palestine Hebrew Wine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carmel Wine Co. v. Palestine Hebrew Wine Co., 174 F. 1023, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5746 (circtsdny 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

WARD Circuit Judge.

In these cases it appears that, following a preliminary injunction pursuant to the opinion of the court in the first-named case (161 Fed. 654), the prima facie ease of the complainant has been fully presented, and has been followed by a brief statement of the defendant, practically admitting the complainant’s case. A decree may be entered for an injunction and accounting, with costs to the complainant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WARD Circuit Judge.

In these cases it appears that, following a preliminary injunction pursuant to the opinion of the court in the first-named case (161 Fed. 654), the prima facie ease of the complainant has been fully presented, and has been followed by a brief statement of the defendant, practically admitting the complainant’s case. A decree may be entered for an injunction and accounting, with costs to the complainant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 F. 1023, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carmel-wine-co-v-palestine-hebrew-wine-co-circtsdny-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack