Carmel v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carmel v. Zoning Board of Appeals

105 A.D.2d 698, 481 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20808

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 5, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.2d 698 (Carmel v. Zoning Board of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carmel v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 105 A.D.2d 698, 481 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Kings Point denying petitioner’s application for an area variance, upon a rehearing, the appeal is from a judgment [699]*699of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), entered January 31, 1984, which dismissed the petition.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Respondents’ determination that petitioner did not pursue a landfill permit in good faith is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, petitioner did not establish practical difficulties sufficient to warrant the grant of an area variance (see Matter of National Merritt v Weist, 41 NY2d 438). Gibbons, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Kings Point denying petitioner’s application for an area variance, upon a rehearing, the appeal is from a judgment [699]*699of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), entered January 31, 1984, which dismissed the petition.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Respondents’ determination that petitioner did not pursue a landfill permit in good faith is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, petitioner did not establish practical difficulties sufficient to warrant the grant of an area variance (see Matter of National Merritt v Weist, 41 NY2d 438). Gibbons, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.2d 698, 481 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carmel-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-nyappdiv-1984.