Carmean v. Reliance Insurance Co.
514 So. 2d 369, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2388, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 15989
Opinions
AFFIRMED.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
DENIED.
FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.
COBB, J., dissents with opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carmean v. Reliance Insurance Co., 514 So. 2d 369, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2388, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 15989 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
514 So. 2d 369 (Carmean v. Reliance Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
CA Fielland Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York
297 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Baron Oil Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins.
470 So. 2d 810 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Broward Marine, Inc. v. Aetna Ins. Co.
459 So. 2d 330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
National U. Fire Ins. Co. v. Lenox Liquors, Inc.
358 So. 2d 533 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Tennessee Corporation v. Lamb Brothers Const. Co.
265 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)