Carman v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carman v. McCall

210 A.D.2d 663, 620 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12411

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 A.D.2d 663 (Carman v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carman v. McCall, 210 A.D.2d 663, 620 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Casey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review two determinations of respondent which denied petitioner’s applications for accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits.

By separate determinations, respondent denied petitioner’s applications for accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits. In each determination, respondent concluded that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his employment as a sanitation man. Respondent’s expert testified that although petitioner suffered from a condition known as chondromalacia of the joint in the right knee, which might cause some pain after a day’s work, the condition did not permanently incapacitate petitioner from the performance of his duties. The testimony of respondent’s expert provides substantial evidence to support respondent’s determinations and, therefore, they must be confirmed (see, Matter of Ramseur v Regan, 154 AD2d 869).

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review two determinations of respondent which denied petitioner’s applications for accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits.

By separate determinations, respondent denied petitioner’s applications for accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits. In each determination, respondent concluded that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his employment as a sanitation man. Respondent’s expert testified that although petitioner suffered from a condition known as chondromalacia of the joint in the right knee, which might cause some pain after a day’s work, the condition did not permanently incapacitate petitioner from the performance of his duties. The testimony of respondent’s expert provides substantial evidence to support respondent’s determinations and, therefore, they must be confirmed (see, Matter of Ramseur v Regan, 154 AD2d 869).

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 663, 620 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carman-v-mccall-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack