Carman v. Carroll

Third Circuit

Carman v. Carroll

588 F. App'x 183

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 18, 2014·No. No. 13-2371·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

JULIO M. FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

This cause came to be heard on appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and upon remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

it is ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court denying Appellants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on the unlawful entry claim and the jury verdict regarding the Appellants’ unlawful seizure claim be and hereby are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT ORDER

JULIO M. FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

This cause came to be heard on appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and upon remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

it is ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court denying Appellants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on the unlawful entry claim and the jury verdict regarding the Appellants’ unlawful seizure claim be and hereby are AFFIRMED.

Carman v. Carroll, 588 F. App'x 183 (3d Cir. 2014).

Pincite

588 F. App'x 183 (Carman v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.