Carmack v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Carmack v. State

1912 OK CR 46, 124 P. 1130, 6 Okla. Crim. 710, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 358

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 11, 1912

DocketNo. A-822.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 46 (Carmack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carmack v. State, 1912 OK CR 46, 124 P. 1130, 6 Okla. Crim. 710, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 358 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted of having-possession of intoxicating liquors away, and otherwise furnish the same contrary to law, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury were on May 12, 1910, each sentenced to serve a term of thirty days in jail and to pay a fine of fifty dollars.. An examination of the record discloses, sufficient evidence to support the conviction, and that the law questions presented are without merit. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted of having-possession of intoxicating liquors away, and otherwise furnish the same contrary to law, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury were on May 12, 1910, each sentenced to serve a term of thirty days in jail and to pay a fine of fifty dollars.. An examination of the record discloses, sufficient evidence to support the conviction, and that the law questions presented are without merit. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 46, 124 P. 1130, 6 Okla. Crim. 710, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carmack-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.