Carmack v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carmack v. State

204 S.W.3d 338, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1570, 2006 WL 3020389

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 24, 2006·No. No. ED 87437·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Gregory Carmack, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Gregory Carmack, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Carmack v. State, 204 S.W.3d 338, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1570, 2006 WL 3020389 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

204 S.W.3d 338 (Carmack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.