Carmack v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Carmack v. State

126 So. 416, 23 Ala. App. 421, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 53

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 18, 1930

Docket5 Div. 784.

StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 416 (Carmack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carmack v. State, 126 So. 416, 23 Ala. App. 421, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 53 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by selling, or having in his possession, prohibited liquors, etc.

There were really no exceptions reserved on the taking of testimony which merit any discussion by us.

The issue of appellant’s guilt, vel non, was properly left to the jury.

Written charge 1, requested by, and refused to, appellant, was a mere argument, and therefore properly refused.

The case appears to h'ave been correctly tried, throughout, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI