Carmack v. Kirby

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carmack v. Kirby

458 S.W.3d 442, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 73, 2015 WL 391699

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 27, 2015·No. WD 77436·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Richard Carmack, son of decedent Irma Carmack, appeals the judgment of the trial court ruling in favor of decedent’s other children in his action to seek specific performance of an “Option to Purchase” and to determine the rights and liabilities of the parties as to a beneficiary deed regarding the same property. The trial court ruled that the “Option to Purchase” was null and void, ruled that the beneficiary deed was not subject to the “Option to Purchase”, denied Richard Carmack’s petition, and found in favor of the other children on both counts of his petition. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Richard Carmack, son of decedent Irma Carmack, appeals the judgment of the trial court ruling in favor of decedent’s other children in his action to seek specific performance of an “Option to Purchase” and to determine the rights and liabilities of the parties as to a beneficiary deed regarding the same property. The trial court ruled that the “Option to Purchase” was null and void, ruled that the beneficiary deed was not subject to the “Option to Purchase”, denied Richard Carmack’s petition, and found in favor of the other children on both counts of his petition. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Carmack v. Kirby, 458 S.W.3d 442, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 73, 2015 WL 391699 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

458 S.W.3d 442 (Carmack v. Kirby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.