Carlyn v. Carlyn

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carlyn v. Carlyn

478 So. 2d 1194, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2683, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17124

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 4, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2065

StatusPublished

This text of 478 So. 2d 1194 (Carlyn v. Carlyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carlyn v. Carlyn, 478 So. 2d 1194, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2683, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17124 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm in part and reverse in part. We hold that the trial court should have provided that the award of permanent periodic alimony terminate in case of the wife’s remarriage. Hartzell v. Hartzell, 434 So.2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We also construe that provision of the final judgment requiring the husband to provide life insurance as security for the payment of financial obligations created by the judgment of dissolution to be subject to both diminution in amount and revocation in accordance with the reduction or cessation of the husband’s obligations. We find no error in any other provision of the judgment.

[1195]*1195ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm in part and reverse in part. We hold that the trial court should have provided that the award of permanent periodic alimony terminate in case of the wife’s remarriage. Hartzell v. Hartzell, 434 So.2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We also construe that provision of the final judgment requiring the husband to provide life insurance as security for the payment of financial obligations created by the judgment of dissolution to be subject to both diminution in amount and revocation in accordance with the reduction or cessation of the husband’s obligations. We find no error in any other provision of the judgment.

[1195]*1195ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

478 So. 2d 1194, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2683, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlyn-v-carlyn-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack