Carlyle v. Carlyle

861 So. 2d 1290, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 83, 2004 WL 40537
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 2004·No. No. 5D03-716·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979) (holding that in appellate proceedings, where no transcript is provided, a trial court’s decision has the presumption [1291]*1291of correctness, and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error).

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlyle v. Carlyle, 861 So. 2d 1290, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 83, 2004 WL 40537 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

861 So. 2d 1290 (Carlyle v. Carlyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)