Carlton Wood v. State
Opinion
jfourtlj Court of i&an £huonio,
September 30, 2014
No. 04-14-00224-CR
Carlton Wood. Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
"rial Court Case No. 2013CR3690
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for ora! argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on November 5. 2014. to the following panel: Justice Martinez, Justice Alvarez, and Justice Chapa. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. APP, P. 48.
Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its deterniination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
It is so OUDKRED on September 30, 2014. C
RebecaC. MartmtfC
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the eal o/ihe said court on this September 30. 2014.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carlton Wood v. State (Carlton Wood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.