Carlton v. Williamsburgh Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carlton v. Williamsburgh Savings Bank

107 A.D.2d 783, 485 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42706

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 28, 1985·Published

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for property loss, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), entered December 2, 1983, which, upon a jury verdict, was in favor of plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499), nor was the verdict excessive (see Juiditta v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 75 AD2d 126).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. O’Connor, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for property loss, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), entered December 2, 1983, which, upon a jury verdict, was in favor of plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499), nor was the verdict excessive (see Juiditta v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 75 AD2d 126).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. O’Connor, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Carlton v. Williamsburgh Savings Bank, 107 A.D.2d 783, 485 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

107 A.D.2d 783 (Carlton v. Williamsburgh Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related