Carlton v. Williamsburgh Savings Bank

107 A.D.2d 783, 485 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42706

This text of 107 A.D.2d 783 (Carlton v. Williamsburgh Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlton v. Williamsburgh Savings Bank, 107 A.D.2d 783, 485 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for property loss, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), entered December 2, 1983, which, upon a jury verdict, was in favor of plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499), nor was the verdict excessive (see Juiditta v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 75 AD2d 126).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. O’Connor, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.
382 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Juiditta v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
75 A.D.2d 126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 A.D.2d 783, 485 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlton-v-williamsburgh-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1985.