Carlton v. State

110 S.E. 411, 27 Ga. App. 647, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 342
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 17, 1921
Docket12840
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 411 (Carlton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlton v. State, 110 S.E. 411, 27 Ga. App. 647, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. The evidence, though conflicting, fully authorized the conviction. It was not error, for any reason assigned, to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Indictment for violation of prohibition law; from Colquitt superior court' — Judge Thomas. August 10, 1921. Louis F. Maire, James Humphreys, for plaintiff in error. Clifford E. Hay, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 411, 27 Ga. App. 647, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlton-v-state-gactapp-1921.