Carlton v. Hescox
107 Mass. 410
This text of 107 Mass. 410 (Carlton v. Hescox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carlton v. Hescox, 107 Mass. 410 (Mass. 1871).
Opinion
It did not appear that the horse in question was an ordinary horse; but as the defendant had left him with the plaintiff to be doctored, there was evidence that he was not in an ordinary condition. Therefore evidence as to how much hay an ordinary horse will eat or consume in a week was immaterial, and its rejection furnishes no ground of exception.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gile v. Atkins
44 A. 896 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
107 Mass. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlton-v-hescox-mass-1871.