Carlton v. Garry

239 So. 2d 106
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 5, 1970
DocketNo. 69-697
StatusPublished

This text of 239 So. 2d 106 (Carlton v. Garry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlton v. Garry, 239 So. 2d 106 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on this appeal from a final judgment in a declaratory judgment suit wherein the trial judge sat as the trier of fact. While there were conflicts in the testimony, it is our opinion that the trial judge’s findings of fact were supported by competent substantial evidence, and that his conclusions of law have not been demonstrated to be in error. The final judgment is affirmed on the principles expressed in Sapp v. Warner, 1932, 105 Fla. 245, 141 So. 124; Standard Oil Co. v. Mehrtens, 1928, 96 Fla. 455, 118 So. 216, 220; Myers v. Van Buskirk, 1928, 96 Fla. 704, 119 So. 123, 125.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sapp v. Warner
144 So. 481 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Standard Oil Co. v. Mehrtens
118 So. 216 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Myers v. Van Buskirk
119 So. 123 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 So. 2d 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlton-v-garry-fladistctapp-1970.