Carlton v. Florida Citrus Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carlton v. Florida Citrus Commission

356 So. 2d 1293, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15220

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 28, 1978

DocketNo. 76-1424

StatusPublished

This text of 356 So. 2d 1293 (Carlton v. Florida Citrus Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carlton v. Florida Citrus Commission, 356 So. 2d 1293, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15220 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the trial court, the appellants, Reuben W. Carlton, Mrs. Margaret Carlton, Wayne Carlton, Mrs. Margaret Talbot, and Ru-Mar, Inc., sought to enjoin the appellee, The Florida Citrus Commission, from enforcing its regulations which prohibit the appellants from marketing their citrus fruit as “Indian River” fruit. The appellants sought the injunction on grounds similar to those successfully asserted by the grove owner in Florida Citrus Commission v. Owens, 239 So.2d 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). However, the trial court, as the trier of facts, found that appellants did not meet the requirements for injunctive relief set out in Florida Citrus Commission v. Owens, supra, and denied appellants’ petition. We believe [1294]*1294there is an adequate basis in the record to support the findings of the trial court. Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ„ and DAKAN, STEPHEN LEE, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the trial court, the appellants, Reuben W. Carlton, Mrs. Margaret Carlton, Wayne Carlton, Mrs. Margaret Talbot, and Ru-Mar, Inc., sought to enjoin the appellee, The Florida Citrus Commission, from enforcing its regulations which prohibit the appellants from marketing their citrus fruit as “Indian River” fruit. The appellants sought the injunction on grounds similar to those successfully asserted by the grove owner in Florida Citrus Commission v. Owens, 239 So.2d 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). However, the trial court, as the trier of facts, found that appellants did not meet the requirements for injunctive relief set out in Florida Citrus Commission v. Owens, supra, and denied appellants’ petition. We believe [1294]*1294there is an adequate basis in the record to support the findings of the trial court. Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ„ and DAKAN, STEPHEN LEE, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 So. 2d 1293, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlton-v-florida-citrus-commission-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack