Carlton v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.

151 So. 328, 112 Fla. 644
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 13, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 151 So. 328 (Carlton v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlton v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co., 151 So. 328, 112 Fla. 644 (Fla. 1933).

Opinions

Whitfield, J.

An action was brought against the corporate surety on the official bond of W. W. Potter as a *645 county commissioner' for Okeechobee County. A demurrer to the declaration was sustained and the plaintiff declining to amend, judgment was rendered for the defendant surety company and the plaintiff took a writ of error.

The condition of the bond is that the county commissioner “shall diligently and faithfully perform all the duties of his said office as prescribed by law.”

The declaration alleges that one of the duties prescribed by law for the county commissioners is to diligently and faithfully conserve the funds of the county; that the named county commissioner did not diligently and faithfully perform all the duties of his office as prescribed by law in this, to-wit:

“Prior to the 10th day of April, 1927, the said Okeechobee County, Florida, in manner prescribed by law, issued and sold its bonds in the sum of $500,000.00, said issue being known and designated as Okeechobee No. 29, Bond Issue, that the Peoples Bank of Okeechobee was designated as depository for proceeds of sale of said bonds in connection with an agreement between the Florida National Bank of Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida, and said Peoples Bank of Okeechobee; * * * that under and by virtue of said agreement, Okeechobee County, Florida, agreed to deposit with Peoples Bank of Okeechobee, the proceeds of said bond issue which should be immediately redeposited with Florida National Bank of Jacksonville, and the deposit in Florida National Bank of Jacksonville would and should be designated as ‘Peoples Bank of Okeechobee’ and that in pursuance of said arrangement said deposit was so made by the County of Okeechobee with Peoples Bank of Okeechobee redeposited said money with Florida National Bank of Jacksonville in an account known as ‘Peoples Bank of Okeechobee’ and that the Florida National Bank of Jacksonville in consideration of such deposit so made by it *646 loaned to the Peoples Bank of Okeechobee, Government bonds or other securities to the value of $300,000 or custodian’s receipts representing such bonds, said receipts being executed by Jacksonville branch of’ Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Georgia, said bonds were loaned by the Florida National Bank of Jacksonville to said Peoples Bank of Okeechobee for the express purpose of enabling the said Peoples Bank of Okeechobee to deposit said bonds with Okeechobee County, to secure and indemnify the said Okeechobee County for the deposit of its money as hereinbefore set forth and said bonds or receipts representing the same were with the knowledge and consent of the Florida National Bank assigned to Okeechobee County, to secure the deposit that was made with Florida National Bank of Jacksonville and deposit that was made in Peoples Bank of Okeechobee and to secure and indemnify Okeechobee County as against any loss by reason of such deposit; * * * that under the terms of agreement between the Peoples Bank of Okeechobee, Florida National Bank and said Okeechobee County, none of the said bonds or receipts evidencing same were to have been returned to Florida National Bank until the deposit above mentioned was reduced by withdrawals made by said County to $300,000 and it was understood and agreed that when said deposit was reduced to $300,000 by said County there was to be returned to Florida National Bank through the Peoples Bank of Okeechobee, $50,000 of bonds or receipts evidencing the same and that when said deposit was reduced to $250,000 by withdrawals being made by said County there was to be delivered to the Florida National Bank through the Peoples Bank of Okeechobee bonds or receipts evidencing the sum in the amount of $50,000 and when said deposit had been reduced to $200,000 there was to have been returned to Florida National Bank through the Peoples Bank *647 bonds in the amount of $50,000 or receipts evidencing the same and when said deposit was reduced by withdrawals made by said County to $150,000, $50,000 of said bonds or receipts evidencing same were to have been returned to Florida National Bank through Peoples Bank and when said deposit was reduced to $100,000 by withdrawals being made by said County there was to have been returned to Florida National Bank $50,000 of bonds so deposited or receipts evidencing same and that when said deposit was reduced to $50,000 balance of bonds deposited or receipts evidencing same was to be returned to Florida National Bank through Peoples Bank; * * * that Okeechobee County •deposited with said Peoples Bank approximately $500,000 proceeds of sale of said bonds which deposit was redeposited with Florida National Bank under the terms aforesaid and that from time to time Okeechobee County, in payment of work for which said bonds were issued, drew upon said deposit until such deposit was reduced to $300,000; that on said date and at such time as aforesaid Okeechobee County should have had a security for the said sum of $300,000, $300,000 in securities or receipts evidencing the same, but the County Commissioners of Okeechobee County, Florida, had heretofore released said securities in the sum of $40,000 and $50,000, respectively; that on September 3, 1928, when the balance in said bank to the credit of said County in Road 29 Bond Fund as aforesaid, was $305,931.62. Okeechobee County had as securities to protect the same, $210,000 of bonds and/or receipts evidencing the same, notwithstanding the fact that under and by virtue of the terms of the agreement as aforesaid * * * there should have been $300,000 of securities available to protect account; * * * that when the said W. W. Potter assumed his duties as a member of the Board of County Commis *648 sioners, Okeechobee County, Florida, that is to say, that on January 8, A. D. 1929, that Okeechobee County had on deposit in the Peoples Bank of Okeechobee the sum of $257,829.61, which said sum represented the balance of Road 29 Bond Fund as aforesaid and that at said time County .of Okeechobee had as securities for said sums of money, $160,000 of the securities heretofore described when there should have been on deposit to the credit .of said County the sum of $250,000 of said securities or receipts evidencing the same; * * * that on to-wit the 4th day of February, A. D. 1929, said W. W. Potter, while acting as a County Commissioner of Okeechobee County, Florida, voted for the release of securities as aforesaid in the sum of $50,000, thereby reducing said securities to $110,000, notwithstanding the fact that there was to the credit of said Okeechobee County in Road 29 account as aforesaid the sum of $206,831.96 and there should have been $200,000 of securities as aforesaid to protect said, account; * * * that on to-wit the 16th day of March, A. D. 1929, said W. W. Potter, while acting as a County Commissioner of Okeechobee County, Florida, voted for the release of securities as aforesaid in the sum of $50,000.00, thereby reducing said securities to $60,000.00, notwithstanding the fact that there was on deposit in the-said Peoples Bank Fund as aforesaid, and there should have been securities in the sum of $150,000.00 to protect said balance in said fund; * * * that on the 6th day of May, 1929, that deposit aforesaid had been reduced to $108,432.97 and that on said date Okeechobee County had.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Fielding
4 So. 2d 678 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
County of Okeechobee v. Florida National Bank
1 So. 2d 263 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 So. 328, 112 Fla. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlton-v-detroit-fidelity-surety-co-fla-1933.