Carlton v. Conner
396 U.S. 272
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carlton v. Conner, 396 U.S. 272 (1970).
396 U.S. 272 (Carlton v. Conner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Polk
568 So. 2d 35 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
DEPT. OF AGR. & CONSUMER SERV. v. Polk
568 So. 2d 35 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Conner v. Reed Bros., Inc.
567 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah
723 F. Supp. 1467 (S.D. Florida, 1989)
Johansson v. Board of Animal Health
601 F. Supp. 1018 (D. Minnesota, 1985)
Davis v. City of South Bay
433 So. 2d 1364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
State, Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Division of Animal Industry v. Denmark
366 So. 2d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
STATE DEPT. OF AGRI. & CONS. SERV., ETC. v. Denmark
366 So. 2d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Johnson v. Pearce
313 So. 2d 812 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1975)
Nacirema Operating Co. v. Johnson
397 U.S. 929 (Supreme Court, 1970)