CARLTON SCARBOROUGH v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 12, 2022
Docket21-3455
StatusPublished

This text of CARLTON SCARBOROUGH v. STATE OF FLORIDA (CARLTON SCARBOROUGH v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CARLTON SCARBOROUGH v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

CARLTON SCARBOROUGH, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D21-3455

[May 12, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 20000807CFAXMX.

Carlton Scarborough, Arcadia, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
CARLTON SCARBOROUGH v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlton-scarborough-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.