CARLTON PAUL BACON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of CARLTON PAUL BACON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (CARLTON PAUL BACON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed March 8, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-0932 Lower Tribunal No. F01-37444B ________________
Carlton Paul Bacon, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.
Carlton Paul Bacon, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. On February 7, 2014, the circuit court entered an order directing the
clerk not to accept any pleading from Carlton Paul Bacon absent the
signature of an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Florida.
This court per curiam affirmed Bacon’s appeal of the February 7, 2014
order. Bacon v. State, 147 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).
On May 4, 2022, Bacon filed a “motion to define and/or clarify
sentence” in the circuit court. The order on appeal summarily denies
Bacon’s motion because the motion contains no signature of a licensed
attorney. Accordingly, we affirm the order summarily denying the relief
requested.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CARLTON PAUL BACON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlton-paul-bacon-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.