Carlton Michael Gary v. Carl Humphrey, Warden
This text of Carlton Michael Gary v. Carl Humphrey, Warden (Carlton Michael Gary v. Carl Humphrey, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ January 07, 2013
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A13A0628. CARLTON MICHAEL GARY v. CARL HUMPHREY, WARDEN, et al.
Calrton Michael Gary filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s order denying the filing of his motion for injunctive relief.1 Because Gary is a prison inmate, the Prison Litigation Reform Act applies. OCGA § 42-12-3 (1). The Act provides that appeals “of all actions filed by prisoners shall be as provided in Code Section 5-6-35,” that is, by application requesting a discretionary appeal. OCGA § 42-12-8. Gary failed to follow the discretionary appeal procedure required by law. “The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this court cannot accept an appeal not made in compliance therewith.” Boyle v. State of Georgia, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby ordered DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 01/07/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
1 Gary filed his notice of appeal in the Supreme Court, which transferred the case to this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carlton Michael Gary v. Carl Humphrey, Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlton-michael-gary-v-carl-humphrey-warden-gactapp-2013.