Carlton Eugene Corbin v. Howard M. Reiner, Successor Dependent Administrator for the Estate of Chlora F. Corbin

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: May 9, 2019
• Docket: 09-19-00091-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-19-00091-CV __________________

CARLTON EUGENE CORBIN, Appellant

V.

HOWARD M. REINER, SUCCESSOR DEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF CHLORA F. CORBIN, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17-30439 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Carlton Eugene Corbin filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s

order of February 23, 2018, which granted the bill of review filed by appellee, set

aside its final judgment of November 20, 2015, and granted a writ of possession in

favor of appellee for premises located in New Caney, Texas. Corbin appealed the

trial court’s judgment, and the Thirteenth Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for

1 want of prosecution due to Corbin’s failure to file a brief that complied with the

requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Corbin v. Reiner, No. 13-

18-00177-CV, 2019 WL 471123, at *1-*3 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Feb. 7, 2019,

no pet. h.) (mem. op.).

On April 4, 2019, we questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal. Corbin did

not file a response. Corbin has not identified a signed order by the trial court that is

appealable at this time. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

_________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice

Submitted on May 8, 2019 Opinion Delivered May 9, 2019

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.