Carlton E. Corbin v. Montgomery County, Texas and Vera Belle Corbin Pavlovsky

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-00245-CV

____________________

CARLTON E. CORBIN, Appellant V.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS AND VERA BELLE CORBIN PAVLOVSKY, Appellees

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17-02-02471-CV ________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Carlton E. Corbin filed a notice of appeal. We notified the parties that information from the District Clerk indicated that no appealable order or judgment had been signed and that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal. In response, Appellant informed the Court that another party filed a motion to continue the hearing on the motion to enter judgment.

2

Generally, appellate courts review only final judgments and interlocutory orders specifically made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The time for perfecting an appeal runs from the date the trial court signs the final judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. The trial court has not reduced the judgment to writing. There is no indication that a final judgment is imminent. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice

Submitted on August 29, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.