Carlton E. Corbin v. Howard M. Reiner

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 18, 2018·No. 13-18-00177-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00177-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

CARLTON E. CORBIN, Appellant, v.

HOWARD M. REINER, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Montgomery County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Contreras, Longoria, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Carlton E. Corbin, appeals a “Judgment on Successor Administrator’s

Petition for Bill of Review.”1 The judgment is contained in the clerk’s record and reflects

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont pursuant

to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C. S.). a file-stamped date of February 23, 2018; however, the judgment does not indicate the

date the judgment was signed. Accordingly, we now ABATE the appeal to the trial court

for a determination regarding the date the judgment was signed.

The trial court shall issue findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the date

that the judgment was signed and to reflect the change in a corrected judgment. These

documents should be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court in a supplemental record within

twenty-one days from the date of this order.

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 18th day of June, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlton E. Corbin v. Howard M. Reiner, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Carlton E. Corbin v. Howard M. Reiner (Carlton E. Corbin v. Howard M. Reiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 73.001
Texas GV § 73.001