Carlton E. Corbin v. Howard M. Reiner
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00177-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
CARLTON E. CORBIN, Appellant, v.
HOWARD M. REINER, Appellee.
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Montgomery County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Contreras, Longoria, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam
Appellant, Carlton E. Corbin, appeals a “Judgment on Successor Administrator’s
Petition for Bill of Review.”1 The judgment is contained in the clerk’s record and reflects
1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont pursuant
to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C. S.). a file-stamped date of February 23, 2018; however, the judgment does not indicate the
date the judgment was signed. Accordingly, we now ABATE the appeal to the trial court
for a determination regarding the date the judgment was signed.
The trial court shall issue findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the date
that the judgment was signed and to reflect the change in a corrected judgment. These
documents should be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court in a supplemental record within
twenty-one days from the date of this order.
It is so ordered.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 18th day of June, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carlton E. Corbin v. Howard M. Reiner (Carlton E. Corbin v. Howard M. Reiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.