Carlstadt National Bank v. Borough of Wood Ridge
87 N.J.L. 685, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 267
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, for reasons stated in the opinion in Carlstadt National Bank v. Borough of Little Ferry, just decided (ante p. 546).
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Harrison, Swayze, Tkenchard, Parker, Bergen, Mixturn, Tí aliso». Black, Ahiedexburgh, White, Teehuxe, Hkfi'KXHKIMER, JJ. 14.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carlstadt National Bank v. Borough of Wood Ridge, 87 N.J.L. 685, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 267 (N.J. 1915).
87 N.J.L. 685 (Carlstadt National Bank v. Borough of Wood Ridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.