Carlson v. Wyman

155 N.W. 418, 189 Mich. 402, 1915 Mich. LEXIS 797
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 1915·No. Calendar No. 26,699·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Kuhn, J.

This is a certiorari proceeding by which it is sought to review the action of the circuit judge in denying the relator’s prayer for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents, who are the president and board of trustees-of the village of Munising, to reconvene and approve his application filed October 1, 1914, and bond filed October 10, 1914, to engage in the retail liquor business for the remainder of the license year.

A meeting of the council was held on October 20, 1914, at which time the relator’s application was rejected without any reason being given, and no action was taken with reference to the bond. It now appears, and is conceded by counsel for relator in his brief, that the period covered by the relator Carlson’s application has passed, and that therefore no relief can now be granted him. This litigation, therefore, at this time presents simply abstract questions of law which do not rest upon existing facts or rights. This of necessity renders it a “moot case,” which we will decline to determine.

The writ of certiorari having been improvidently issued, it will be dismissed, without costs.

Brooke, C. J., and Person, Stone, Ostrander, Bird, Moore, and Steere, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlson v. Wyman, 155 N.W. 418, 189 Mich. 402, 1915 Mich. LEXIS 797 (Mich. 1915).

155 N.W. 418 (Carlson v. Wyman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

20231207_C363697_43_363697.Opn.Ord.Pdf
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2023
Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. City of Detroit
118 N.W.2d 258 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1962)
Herbert v. Howard
267 N.W. 814 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1936)
Van DeVegt v. Board of County Commissioners
55 P.2d 703 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1936)
Barron v. Belongy
200 N.W. 944 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1924)
Gildemeister v. Lindsay
180 N.W. 633 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.
179 N.W. 350 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Tierney v. Union School District
177 N.W. 955 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Blickle v. Board of Education
177 N.W. 385 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
People v. Watters
158 N.W. 865 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1916)
Schouwink v. Ferguson
157 N.W. 726 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1916)