Carlson v. Warren (In re Warren)

70 B.R. 124, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6896
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri
DecidedJanuary 15, 1986
DocketBankruptcy No. 83-02608-SW; Adv. No. 85-0511-SW
StatusPublished

This text of 70 B.R. 124 (Carlson v. Warren (In re Warren)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlson v. Warren (In re Warren), 70 B.R. 124, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6896 (W.D. Mo. 1986).

Opinion

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

DENNIS J. STEWART, Chief Judge.

“[A] ‘motion for reconsideration,’ although filed within 10 days, contained no request to alter or amend judgment (though maybe that was implicit) but merely informed the court that the movant would file at a later date a memorandum of law. Essentially, then, the motion was a request for extension of time, and extensions of time are not permitted for Rule 59(e) motions. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b).” A.D. Weiss Lithograph Company v. Illinois Adhesive Products, 705 F.2d 249, 250 (7th Cir.1983). It is therefore

ORDERED that the above and foregoing “motion for reconsideration” be, and it is hereby, DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 B.R. 124, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlson-v-warren-in-re-warren-mowd-1986.