Carlson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carlson v. State

874 So. 2d 24, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6039, 2004 WL 912334

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 2004·No. No. 5D01-3089·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

The motion for rehearing en banc filed by Joseph Carlson is hereby granted. We withdraw our previously issued opinion and substitute the following in its place.

For the reasons explained in Jones v. State, 872 So.2d 938 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), we reverse the sentence and remand to the trial court to strike the minimum mandatory provision improperly included in Carlson’s sentence.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA, C.J., SHARP, W., PETERSON, GRIFFIN, THOMPSON, PLEUS, PALMER, ORFINGER, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

The motion for rehearing en banc filed by Joseph Carlson is hereby granted. We withdraw our previously issued opinion and substitute the following in its place.

For the reasons explained in Jones v. State, 872 So.2d 938 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), we reverse the sentence and remand to the trial court to strike the minimum mandatory provision improperly included in Carlson’s sentence.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA, C.J., SHARP, W., PETERSON, GRIFFIN, THOMPSON, PLEUS, PALMER, ORFINGER, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Carlson v. State, 874 So. 2d 24, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6039, 2004 WL 912334 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

874 So. 2d 24 (Carlson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related