Carlson v. Ritch-Carlson

741 So. 2d 1264, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13454, 1999 WL 817735
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1999·No. No. 99-1707·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. § 61.1308(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1997); Alvarez v. Alvarez, 566 So.2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Osterink v. Mabrey, 552 So.2d 291 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Genoe v. Genoe, 515 So.2d 237 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), review denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1987); Prickett v. Priekett, 498 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Ruse v. Ruse, 478 [1265] So.2d 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Perez v. Perez, 462 So.2d 546 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlson v. Ritch-Carlson, 741 So. 2d 1264, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13454, 1999 WL 817735 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

741 So. 2d 1264 (Carlson v. Ritch-Carlson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alvarez v. Alvarez
566 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Osterink v. Mabrey
552 So. 2d 291 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Prickett v. Prickett
498 So. 2d 1060 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Genoe v. Genoe
515 So. 2d 237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Perez v. Perez
462 So. 2d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Ruse v. Ruse
478 So. 2d 102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)